I have the following method to save an Object to a file: // Save an object out to the disk public static void SerializeObject<T>(this T toSerialize, String filename) { XmlSerializer

Side notes: (1) in order to manage a json serialization the properties of the class must have at least getters, (2) JsonSerializer.Serialize(lad) prints all in one line; if you want to get an …

$ (this).serialize () -- How to add a value? Asked 14 years, 5 months ago Modified 1 year, 9 months ago Viewed 148k times

I found out that some classes use the [Serializable] attribute. What is it? When should I use it? What kinds of benefits will I get?

DataSet data = new DataSet(); // do some work here to populate 'data' string output = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(data); However, this uses the property names from data when …

To get around this; Serialize the DataTable and DataColumn definitions in separate response objects. Deserialize the DataColumn definitions in the response before reading in the table. …

Json.Serialize(MyClass) How can I exclude a public property of it? (It has to be public, as I use it in my code somewhere else)

2 An approach which I have been using in my Flask app to serialize Class instance to JSON response. Github project for reference

The linked question is essentially telling you not to try to serialize the datetime object, but rather to convert it to a string in the common ISO format before serializing.

Rather than take the approach of serializing and deserializing JavaScript objects to an internal format the approach here is to serialize JavaScript objects out to native JavaScript.